Archival Literature

Papers at International, Peer-Reviewed Conferences

  1. [1] G. Lisowski, D. McHugh, and M. Rapp (2016) Winning questions: inquisitive semantics and the lottery paradox. In 5th LSE Graduate Conference in Philosophy of Probability, External Links: Link Cited by: p1.

Theses

  1. [2] M. Rapp (2018) Hybrid logics for arguments, beliefs, and their dynamics. Master’s Thesis, University of Amsterdam. External Links: Link Cited by: p1.
  2. [3] M. Rapp (2016) Is there an ergodic axiom in economics?. Master’s Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science. Cited by: p1.
  3. [1] M. Rapp (2013) Braucht die Ökonomie einen Paradigmenwechsel? Methodische Vorschläge nach Elinor Ostrom. Bachelor’s Thesis, Munich School of Philosophy. Cited by: p1.

Gray Literature

Papers at Peer-Reviewed Workshops

  1. [1] A. Adrian, M. Kohlhase, and M. Rapp (2021) A novel understanding of legal syllogism as a starting point for better legal symbolic ai systems. In 24. Internationalen Rechtsinformatik Symposion (IRIS 2021), External Links: Link Cited by: p1.
  2. [3] M. Kohlhase, A. Adrian, and M. Rapp (2021) Context graphs for ampliative analogical legal reasoning and argumentation. In Cybergovernance, Tagungsband des 24. Internationalen Rechtsinformatik Symposion IRIS, E. S. und Walter Hötzendorfer und Franz Kummer und Ahti Saarenpää und Stefan Eder und Philip Hanke (Ed.), pp. 231ff.. External Links: Link Cited by: p1.
  3. [2] S. Hungerbühler, H. P. Jóhnsson, G. Lisowski, and M. Rapp (2019) Social choice and the problem of recommending essential readings. In At the Intersection of Language, Logic, and Information. ESSLLI 2018.At the Intersection of Language, Logic, and Information. ESSLLI 2018., J. Sikos and E. Pacuit (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11667. Cited by: p1.
  4. [4] M. Kohlhase and M. Rapp (2019) Context graphs for argumentation logics. In Proceedings of the conference ”lernen, wissen, daten, analysen”, LWDAProceedings of the Conference ”Lernen, Wissen, Daten, Analysen”, LWDA, R. Jäschke and M. Weidlich (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2454, pp. 265–279. External Links: Link Cited by: p1.
  5. [5] G. Lisowski and M. Rapp (2017) Is the triviality of agm a serious possibility. In Logic in the Wild: 6th workshop in the ’Logic, Reasoning & Rationality’ series, External Links: Link Cited by: p1.

Unpublished

  1. [1] M. Kohlhase and M. Rapp (2020) Argumentation via context graphs. Cited by: p1.
  2. [2] M. Rapp, A. Adrian, and M. Kohlhase (2020) Context graphs for legal reasoning and argumentation. External Links: 2007.00732, Link Cited by: p1.